🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to pass a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," commented a leading MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the local government level amid federal inaction.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more measured position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.